Web3 Association
  • About
    • πŸ‘‹About W3A
    • 🎯Focus
    • πŸ’‘Approach
      • πŸŽ“Shared learning
      • 🀲Contribution outcomes
        • πŸ’»Open source software overview
        • πŸ“„Standards overview
      • πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈContribution process
        • πŸͺ΄Creating the right environment
    • πŸ—ΊοΈRoadmap
      • ✍️Current roadmap plan
      • πŸ“—Other areas of focus
    • πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦Contributors
      • πŸ§‘George Lovegrove
        • Contribution logs
          • November 2024
          • October 2024
          • September 2024
          • August 2024
          • July 2024
          • June 2024
          • May 2024
          • April 2024
          • March 2024
          • February 2024
          • January 2024
          • December 2023
          • November 2023
          • October 2023
          • September 2023
          • August 2023
    • πŸ’¬Links & contact information
  • Services
    • πŸ‘€Contributor funding operator
    • ✏️Web3 treasury consulting
  • Our Resources
    • Treasuries
    • Contributors
    • Contributionism
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Overview
  • Contribution outputs
  1. About
  2. Contributors
  3. George Lovegrove
  4. Contribution logs

July 2024

Contributions for July 2024

PreviousAugust 2024NextJune 2024

Last updated 4 months ago

Contribution duration - Full month

Overview

  • Voting score approaches - Looked at the different parts of score voting approaches to determine what combination of approaches could be the most effective for Web3 ecosystems. Expressive approval voting emerged as a suggestion for ecosystems to explore.

  • Contributor funding - The goals and objectives of a contributor funding process were documented along with a development roadmap and a experiment setup guide. The experiment setup guide suggested the tech stack, provided some templates, outlined the parameters and approaches and also made some time and cost estimations.

  • Contributor funding example - An example resource was made to showcase what a contributor funding experiment could look like. The suggested tools were created and filled in with some example data to give a good idea of what the funding process could look like in practice.

Contribution outputs

Documents

Treasury resources

Contributor funding resources

Contributor funding experiment example

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦
πŸ§‘
Score voting approaches
Points allocation approaches
Maximum points allocation approaches
Maximum proposal allocation factors for consideration
No maximum allocation
Quadratic allocation
Fixed maximum allocation
Points allocation factors for consideration
Voting power per decision
Number of proposals multiple points per decision
Available positions single point per decision
Available positions multiple points per decision
Multiple points per decision
Multiple points per proposal
Single point per proposal
Applying the score voting examples to these approaches
Voting approach improvement ideas
Expressive approval voting with decision disapprovals
Objectives
Development roadmap
Experiment setup
Tech stack
Templates
Guides
Community guide
Contributor guide
Contribution attestation guide
Voter guide
Expressive approval voting guide
Funding operator guide
Forms
Contributor proposal form
Contribution log form
Contribution attestation form
Questionnaires
Contributor proposal submission feedback
Contributor selection decision feedback
Contributor peer review and feedback
Voter experiment feedback
Contributor experiment feedback
Google Sheets
Contributor voting sheet
Approach and parameter decisions
Community guide
Contributor guide
Contribution attestation guide
Voter guide
Funding operator guide
Priority suggestions
Contribution board
Funded contributors
Alice Adams
June 2024
Candidates
Alice Adams
Bob Baker
Charlie Collins